Template talk:Infobox manuscript: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
(→revamping the template: new section) |
(→revamping the template: Reply) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
atb [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 23:18, 28 September 2024 (CEST) | atb [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 23:18, 28 September 2024 (CEST) | ||
:and a second "digital images" field would be nice, too [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 23:25, 28 September 2024 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 22:25, 28 September 2024
revamping the template
We will soon have articles on all libraries holding at least one of our manuscripts. The infoboxes for manuscripts will thus only need one entry linking to the relevant page e.g. [[Paris, BnF]], and all information on the library will be found there; the fields "Place", "GND", and "ISIL" can therefore go.
Also, I suggest we discontinue "generalregion" and "specificregion".
Finally, I take the opportunity to automatically link from the infobox to all collections, at the moment this only works for the first one.
atb Christof Rolker (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2024 (CEST)
- and a second "digital images" field would be nice, too Christof Rolker (talk) 23:25, 28 September 2024 (CEST)
