Collectio Ambrosiana II: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:Descriptions lacking categories" to "Category:Description lacking categories") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Article lacking categories" to "Category:Lacks categories") |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Categories == | == Categories == | ||
* article lacks categories [[Category: | * article lacks categories [[Category:Lacks categories]] | ||
* saec. XII [[Category:Collection saec XII]] | * saec. XII [[Category:Collection saec XII]] | ||
* small [[Category:Small (100 to 500 canons) collection]] | * small [[Category:Small (100 to 500 canons) collection]] | ||
* Collection [[Category:Canonical Collection]] | * Collection [[Category:Canonical Collection]] | ||
* Key is MJ [[Category:Collection Key is MJ]] | * Key is MJ [[Category:Collection Key is MJ]] |
Latest revision as of 23:00, 26 September 2024
Title | Collectio Ambrosiana II |
---|---|
Key | MJ |
Size | Small (100 to 500 canons) |
Terminus post quem | 1100 |
Terminus ante quem | 1150 |
Century | saec. XII |
Main author | Fowler-Magerl, Linda |
The canonistic material in the Ms Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana I. 145 inf., altogether 396 canons, was copied at Milan by a number of different scribes and does not constitute a unitary collection nor does it fill the entire manuscript. The most recent analysis of the canonistic material is that of Giorgio Picasso. He calls it the Ambrosiana II. The present analysis (MJ) uses his numbering. It can be assumed that the collection was compiled for use at Milan, probably by canons. Canon 228 is a long letter to an archbishop of Milan and canon 235 a letter of Petrus Damiani to Milanese clerics. The most recent text is canon 119, a letter of pope Urban II (JL 5388). The most recent formal sources are: the Tripartita of Ivo of Chartres and the Liber sententiarum of [125] Magister A (canons 46–168) which means that the surviving form of the collection was completed in the first half of the 12th century. A series of canons on marriage (canons 52–64 and 83) taken ultimately from the sentences of Magister A was used for the appendix to the Collectio XX librorum in the Ms Vat. lat. 1350.
The manuscript contains a core of texts older than the rest of the accumulated material, however. This core represents an earlier, once independent collection. In the Ambrosiana II it extends from canon 170 to canon 237. The most recent text is canon 236, a pseudo-Gregorian text, attributed here to Alexander II (Ecclesia que per pactionem pretii, JE † 1948). The sources of this older core are the Liber decretorum of Burchard in the form augmented in northern Italy and a Beneventan collection – perhaps the Collectio IX librorum or a derivative. Following the older core of texts are penitential canons, many of them from the penitential Vallicelliana I.
A number of canons found in the older core were used for the Collectio XVII librorum (Ambrosiana II, cc. 175, 199, 173, 236, 181, 237, 185, 234, 188, 206, 228). This core of texts was also used for the Collectio canonum in München, BSB, Clm 16086 from the canonry of Sankt Nikola in Passau (Ambrosiana II, cc. 170, 172, 175–176, 178–179, 182– 193, 196–204, 213, 217, 227, 229–237).
Literature
For the analysis see Giorgio Picasso, Collezioni canoniche milanesi del secolo XII, Milan 1969. A description of the manuscript is found on pp. 20–23, a description of the collection on pp. 161–222, the analysis of the collection on pp. 81–143; for important additions see also Horst Fuhrmann’s recension in DA 27 (1971), pp. 581– 583. See also Giorgio Picasso, Nuove identificazioni nelle Collezioni canoniche milanesi del sec. XII, BMCL 3 (1969), pp.139–141. – For the Collectio XX librorum, see Roberto Bellini, Un abrégé del Decreto di Burcardo di Worms: La collezione canonica in 20 libri (Ms. Vat. Lat. 1350), Apollinaris 69 (1996), pp. 119– 195. – For the use of Burchard in the augmented form common to northern and central Italy, see Fowler-Magerl, Fine Distinctions, pp. 148–149. For the Tripartita as the source of canons in the manuscript (and not the Decretum of Ivo as was once thought) see Landau, Kanonessammlungen in der Lombardei, pp. 452 with n. 107 and 456. For the use of the sentences of Magister A see Hubert Mordek, Systematische Kanonessammlungen vor Gratian: Forschungsstand und neue Aufgaben, in: Proceedings of the 6th ICMCL, p. 197. – On pages 243–248 of the analysis Picasso edited texts not known to him elsewhere. Some of the same canons can be found in the Ms Munich, StB Clm 16086 see Fowler-Magerl, Vier and franzöische und spanische vorgratianische Kanonessammlungen, pp. 140–141. For the use of [126] the core of Ambrosiana II for the collection of the canonry of Saint-Hilaire see p. 176 n. 145. – Kéry, Collections p. 292.
Categories
- article lacks categories
- saec. XII
- small
- Collection
- Key is MJ