Freiburg, Universitätsbibliothek, 8

Library	Universitätsibliothek
Shelfmark	8
Century	s. IX2
General region of origin	Lake Constance region (Kéry/Mordek/Reynolds)
Collection	Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii)
Collection 2	[[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana]]
Main author	Bruno Schalekamp

Freiburg, Universitätsibliothek, 8 is a ninth-century (second half) manuscript of 138 folios in 2 cols. with 34 lines (305 x 265 mm (220-230 x 180-195 mm)). Its codicological composition reads as follows: 17 quires, II⁴ + 2 x IV²⁰ + III²⁶ + 6 x IV⁷⁴ + 4 x V¹¹⁴ + 3 x IV¹³⁸, quire signatures in Roman numerals start at I¹² until XV¹³⁰; modern foliation in Arabic numerals in lead pencil. The manuscript was penned by three hands (A: fols. 1ra-4va; B: 5ra-120rb; C: 120rb-138vb), as well as glossed by Bernold of Constance from fol. 20v onwards and an anonymous cleric who Autenrieth names ‘Anonymous A’. It was written in Caroline minuscule and originates from the Lake Constance region, most probably from the Cathedral School of Constance. The codex was acquired by the Constance Cathedral library in 1343, where it was bound in Constance fashion in s. XV, and later acquired by the Universitätsbibliothek of Freiburg in 1821.

Contents

The manuscript is a medium-sized codex and contains mostly canonical material (Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana and Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii)), as well as a list of Roman provinces (Polemius), the Notitia Galliarum, an epistle of Isidore de Seville, a decretal of Gregory the Great, and Amalarius of Metz's epistle to Charlemagne. The parchment has been kept relatively well, indicating the manuscript was kept in a clean and safe environment. Only some corners or margins of folios have dark spots, pointing to regular wear-and-tear through study and use. It includes clear rubrics on the top of every folio side and in between each text for the Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana, sometimes in the same ink as the base text or in red.

Fol. 4r of the manuscript, showing the first six canons, as well af the beginning of the seventh, of the Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii)

MS Freiburg has probably been used regularly, as its marginalia point out. Various symbols, added authorities, clarifications on particular topics and commentaries next to the base text show a clear interest after its production. Probably even a few hundred years later, as some hands show late Carolinian minuscule training. For example, on fol. 41v a much later hand commented on the contents of the Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana, adding his own sources and interpretations to the conciliar source material. Still, the base text has remained relatively unedited with only a few corrections, which tells us this body of knowledge must have been perceived as authoritative.

See the digitized version: http://dl.ub.uni-freiburg.de/diglit/hs8/0001

folios	texts
	Front cover. Short text with historical examples of the supreme spiritual power over the self. End of the 11th century
1r	Brief description of contents. Added in the 14th century
1ra-1va	Polemius Silvius' Nomina provinciarum imperii Romani
1va-2rb	Notitia provinciarum et civitatum Galliae
3ra-4ra	Isidore de Seville's Epistola ad Massonam
4ra-va	Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii), chapters I-VIII
5ra-133vb	Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana
133vb-134vb	Gregory the Great's Decretum ad clerum in basilica beati Petri apostoli
134vb-135vb	Unknown text
136ra-138vb	Amalarius of Metz's Epistola ad Carolum imperatorem
	Back cover. Excerpts of the Pseudo-Isidorian decretals. Second half of the 9th century, about 850-888 (Kéry)

Literature

Amann, Praestantiorum aliquot codicum Vols. 1-2 (1836-1837), p. 1-13 and 62-63; Autenrieth, Die Domschule von Konstanz (1956), p. 26-7, 42, 68-75, 107, 121-126, 128-133, 154, and 169; Brambach, Notitia provinciarum (1868), 266-267; Kéry, Canonical Collections (1999), p. 15, 75, 81, and 106; Kunstmann, ‘Das Eherecht des Bischofs Bernhard von Pavia’ (1861), p. 5-14; Mordek, Bibliotheca capitularium (1995), p. 436; Mordek, Kirchenrecht und Reform (1975), p. 244 and 259; Reynolds, Law and Liturgy (1994), p. 116 (IV).