Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Set default sortkey.)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec XII) is a copy of the second version of the [[Collectio Tripartita]] (= '''K''' in the Brett/Nowak edition).  
Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec. XII) is a copy of the second version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' (= '''K''' in the Brett/Nowak edition).  


It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged.
It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged.
Line 5: Line 5:


For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version [https://archive.org/details/RobbinsMS102%2011/mode/1up here]) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there.
For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version [https://archive.org/details/RobbinsMS102%2011/mode/1up here]) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there.
== Links ==
* {{author|Brett/Nowak}} edition of ''Tripartita'': http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html
== Literature ==
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|244}}


[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript]]

Revision as of 21:15, 15 September 2024

Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec. XII) is a copy of the second version of the Collectio Tripartita (= K in the Brett/Nowak edition).

It ends with some early additions – for these see DKMN app.pdf, so the text is not physically damaged. As far as it goes, it is very close to N, and the abbreviated DM, but none is a copy of any other. It may be significant that there is a marked change of script in N and D where K ends, though not in M. Almost certainly at Lambach by the time the (unpublished) catalogue was drawn up, but almost certainly written at Admont.

For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version here) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there.

Links

Literature

Kéry, Collections p. 244