Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102: Difference between revisions
Clemens Radl (talk | contribs) m (Set default sortkey.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec XII) is a copy of the second version of the [[Collectio Tripartita]] (= '''K''' in the Brett/Nowak edition). | Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec. XII) is a copy of the second version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' (= '''K''' in the Brett/Nowak edition). | ||
It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged. | It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged. | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version [https://archive.org/details/RobbinsMS102%2011/mode/1up here]) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there. | For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version [https://archive.org/details/RobbinsMS102%2011/mode/1up here]) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there. | ||
== Links == | |||
* {{author|Brett/Nowak}} edition of ''Tripartita'': http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html | |||
== Literature == | |||
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|244}} | |||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | [[Category:Manuscript]] |
Revision as of 21:15, 15 September 2024
Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec. XII) is a copy of the second version of the Collectio Tripartita (= K in the Brett/Nowak edition).
It ends with some early additions – for these see DKMN app.pdf, so the text is not physically damaged. As far as it goes, it is very close to N, and the abbreviated DM, but none is a copy of any other. It may be significant that there is a marked change of script in N and D where K ends, though not in M. Almost certainly at Lambach by the time the (unpublished) catalogue was drawn up, but almost certainly written at Admont.
For images of some pages and a description of the manuscript see https://digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/229768?ln=en&v=uv#?xywh=-1054%2C-162%2C4475%2C3236 (archived version here) Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there.
Links
- Brett/Nowak edition of Tripartita: http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html
Literature
Kéry, Collections p. 244