Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102: Difference between revisions
(created article based on Brett) |
m (added links, minor changes) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged. | It ends with some early additions – for these see [https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/dkmn%20app.pdf DKMN app.pdf], so the text is not physically damaged. | ||
As far as it goes, it is very close to N, and the abbreviated DM, but none is a copy of any other. It may be significant that there is a marked change of script in N and D where K ends, though not in M. Almost certainly at Lambach by the time the (unpublished) catalogue was drawn up, but almost certainly written at Admont. | As far as it goes, it is very close to '''N''', and the abbreviated '''DM''', but none is a copy of any other. It may be significant that there is a marked change of script in '''N''' and '''[[Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 162|D]]''' where '''K''' ends, though not in '''[[München, BSB, Clm 12603|M]]'''. Almost certainly at Lambach by the time the (unpublished) catalogue was drawn up, but almost certainly written at Admont. | ||
For a detailed description of the ms see: | For a detailed description of the ms see: http://app.cul.columbia.edu:8080/exist/scriptorium/individual/CU-ROB-738.xml?showLightbox=yes. Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there. | ||
738.xml?showLightbox=yes | |||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | [[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 13 September 2024
Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102 (saec XII) is a copy of the second version of the Collectio Tripartita (= K in the Brett/Nowak edition).
It ends with some early additions – for these see DKMN app.pdf, so the text is not physically damaged. As far as it goes, it is very close to N, and the abbreviated DM, but none is a copy of any other. It may be significant that there is a marked change of script in N and D where K ends, though not in M. Almost certainly at Lambach by the time the (unpublished) catalogue was drawn up, but almost certainly written at Admont.
For a detailed description of the ms see: http://app.cul.columbia.edu:8080/exist/scriptorium/individual/CU-ROB-738.xml?showLightbox=yes. Over a short section the text is laid out very oddly, as may be seen at fos 72v-3, illustrated there.
