Paris, BnF, lat. 4282: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Paris, BnF, lat. 4282 is a copy of the first version of the [[Collectio Tripartita]] (= '''Q''' in the Brett/Nowak edition). | Paris, BnF, lat. 4282 (saec XII 2/2) is a copy of the first version of the [[Collectio Tripartita]] (= '''Q''' in the Brett/Nowak edition). | ||
Written in long lines; complete, and with the dislocation in Trip. 2.3-4 and 26 as in '''[[Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345|H]]''', with which it shares many variants, and another, not in '''[[Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345|H]]''', after Trip. 1.46.16. The text is idiosyncratic and idiosyncratically corrected. It also has a few dislocations of its own (and is misbound after fo. 80). Mid to late s.xii. See too Szuromi (2010) 76-8 | Written in long lines; complete, and with the dislocation in Trip. 2.3-4 and 26 as in '''[[Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345|H]]''', with which it shares many variants, and another, not in '''[[Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345|H]]''', after Trip. 1.46.16. The text is idiosyncratic and idiosyncratically corrected. It also has a few dislocations of its own (and is misbound after fo. 80). Mid to late s.xii. See too Szuromi (2010) 76-8 | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* description https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc63079s | * description https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc63079s | ||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | |||
[[Category:Digitized Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript of IT]] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Paris, BnF, lat. 04282}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Paris, BnF, lat. 04282}} |
Latest revision as of 13:18, 13 September 2024
Paris, BnF, lat. 4282 (saec XII 2/2) is a copy of the first version of the Collectio Tripartita (= Q in the Brett/Nowak edition).
Written in long lines; complete, and with the dislocation in Trip. 2.3-4 and 26 as in H, with which it shares many variants, and another, not in H, after Trip. 1.46.16. The text is idiosyncratic and idiosyncratically corrected. It also has a few dislocations of its own (and is misbound after fo. 80). Mid to late s.xii. See too Szuromi (2010) 76-8
Links
- The manuscript, or rather a b/w microfilm of it, is digitized at https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b90669176
- description https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc63079s