Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 162: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
m Reverting corrupting sortkey change.
MB (talk | contribs)
infobox, categories, form
Line 2: Line 2:
     | library        = Admont, Stiftsbibliothek
     | library        = Admont, Stiftsbibliothek
     | shelfmark      = Cod. 162
     | shelfmark      = Cod. 162
     | descriptionat  = [https://manuscripta.at/?ID=26043 manuscripta]
     | descriptionat  = [https://manuscripta.at/?ID=26043 manuscripta.at]
    | descriptionat2 = [http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html ivo-of-chartres.github]
     | digitalimages  = [https://manuscripta.at/diglit/AT1000-162/0001 manuscripta.at]
     | digitalimages  = [https://manuscripta.at/diglit/AT1000-162/0001 manuscripta]
     | author1        = [[User:MB|Martin Brett]]
     | author1        = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]]
     | normregion    = unknown
     | normregion    = unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to [[Categories for manuscripts by region]]. -->
     | coll          = Collectio Tripartita
     | coll          = Collectio Tripartita
     | century        = saec XII
     | century        = saec. XII
}}Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 162 is a manuscript (saec. XII) of 207 folios containing a mix of canon law and polemic writings.
}}


On fol. 6-139, in long lines, is a copy of the second version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' (= '''D''' in the Brett/Nowak edition). The manuscript is not damaged at end, where the collection ends with ''Tripartita'' B20.58. It is closely related to '''[[Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102|K]]''', '''[[Gniezno, Archiwum Archidiecezjalne, 25|N]]''', and '''[[München, BSB, Clm 12603|M]]''' though a copy of none (or of their source, since it lacks some of '''KN'''’s distinctive shared readings), and among these is very close to '''M''', like which it omits canons at fairly frequent intervals. Like '''M''' too, it lacks the additions after ''Tripartita'' B9.2 which are found in '''N''', but the other omitted canons in both '''D''' and '''M''' make the significance of this hard to assess. The text has been heavily corrected, but not apparently from a copy of another version. Has a small set of additions after ''Tripartita'' B 14, and extensive material added in several hands at the beginning and end, much of it also shared with '''M''', for which, at least in these sections, it may well be the source – for which see Brett's account online.
Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 162 is a manuscript (saec. XII, in long lines) of 207 folios containing a mix of canon law and polemic writings.


On fol. 154v-163v "Canones aliquot quibus exempla regum excommunicatorum addita sunt". Otherwise the second half of the codex (fol. 140r-206v) contains Agobar´s ''De antiphonario'' and above all polemical works by Bernold of Konstanz, Manegold of Lautenbach, Peter Damian, Deusdedit, and Anselm of Lucca.
On fol. 6-139 it contains a copy of the second version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' (= '''D''' in the {{author|Brett/Nowak}} edition). The manuscript is not damaged at end, where the collection ends with ''Tripartita'' B20.58. It is closely related to '''KNM''' (= [[Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102]], [[Gniezno, Archiwum Archidiecezjalne, 25]], and [[München, BSB, Clm 12603]]) though a copy of none (or of their source, since it lacks some of '''KN'''’s distinctive shared readings), and among these is very close to '''M''', like which it omits canons at fairly frequent intervals. Like '''M''' too, it lacks the additions after ''Tripartita'' B9.2 which are found in '''N''', but the other omitted canons in both '''D''' and '''M''' make the significance of this hard to assess. The text has been heavily corrected, but not apparently from a copy of another version. Has a small set of additions after ''Tripartita'' B 14, and extensive material added in several hands at the beginning and end, much of it also shared with '''M''', for which, at least in these sections, it may well be the source – for which see Brett's account online.
 
On fol. 154v-163v "Canones aliquot quibus exempla regum excommunicatorum addita sunt". Otherwise the second half of the codex (fol. 140r-206v) contains Agobar´s ''De antiphonario'' and above all polemical works by Bernold of Konstanz, Manegold of Lautenbach, Peter Damian, Deusdedit, and Anselm of Lucca. Note the ''arbor consanguinitatis'' on fol. 142r.


== Links ==
== Links ==
* [https://manuscripta.at/?ID=26043 Description at manuscripta.at]
For a list of manuscripts and a provisional edition, see {{Author|Brett/Nowak}}, [http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html Tripartita]
* The manuscript is digitized at https://manuscripta.at/diglit/AT1000-162/0001
* Brett/Nowak edition: http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html


== Literature ==
== Literature ==
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|245}}
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|245}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 00162}}


[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]]  
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]]  
Line 28: Line 29:
[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript in Admont, Stiftsbibliothek]]
[[Category:Manuscript in Admont, Stiftsbibliothek]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 00162}}

Revision as of 23:13, 29 March 2025

Library Admont, Stiftsbibliothek
Shelfmark Cod. 162
Century saec. XII
Provenance ?
European region of origin unknown
Collection Collectio Tripartita
Digital Images manuscripta.at
Description at manuscripta.at
Author Martin Brett


Admont, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. 162 is a manuscript (saec. XII, in long lines) of 207 folios containing a mix of canon law and polemic writings.

On fol. 6-139 it contains a copy of the second version of the Collectio Tripartita (= D in the Brett/Nowak edition). The manuscript is not damaged at end, where the collection ends with Tripartita B20.58. It is closely related to KNM (= Berkeley, University of California, Law Library, Robbins 102, Gniezno, Archiwum Archidiecezjalne, 25, and München, BSB, Clm 12603) though a copy of none (or of their source, since it lacks some of KN’s distinctive shared readings), and among these is very close to M, like which it omits canons at fairly frequent intervals. Like M too, it lacks the additions after Tripartita B9.2 which are found in N, but the other omitted canons in both D and M make the significance of this hard to assess. The text has been heavily corrected, but not apparently from a copy of another version. Has a small set of additions after Tripartita B 14, and extensive material added in several hands at the beginning and end, much of it also shared with M, for which, at least in these sections, it may well be the source – for which see Brett's account online.

On fol. 154v-163v "Canones aliquot quibus exempla regum excommunicatorum addita sunt". Otherwise the second half of the codex (fol. 140r-206v) contains Agobar´s De antiphonario and above all polemical works by Bernold of Konstanz, Manegold of Lautenbach, Peter Damian, Deusdedit, and Anselm of Lucca. Note the arbor consanguinitatis on fol. 142r.

Links

For a list of manuscripts and a provisional edition, see Brett/Nowak, Tripartita

Literature

Kéry, Collections p. 245