Collectio Sinemuriensis - Revision history

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "Cambridge, Parker Library" to "Cambridge, Corpus Christi"

2025-12-28T10:26:37Z

Text replacement - "Cambridge, Parker Library" to "Cambridge, Corpus Christi"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 28 December 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	There are fragments of the Paris/Schlettstadt version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss Vat. Ott. lat. 811, fol. 112r–114v and Vat. Reg. lat. 453, fol. 50r–55v. These fragments were once part of the same manuscript.		There are fragments of the Paris/Schlettstadt version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss Vat. Ott. lat. 811, fol. 112r–114v and Vat. Reg. lat. 453, fol. 50r–55v. These fragments were once part of the same manuscript.

	Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' are found in the ''[[Collectio Atrebatensis]]'' and together with excerpts from the ''Quadripartitus'' and the ''Sangermanensis'' in the [[Collectio canonum in Cambridge, CCC, 442\|collection in Cambridge, ~~Parker Library~~ 442]]. The section containing letters of Gregory I in the ''Collectio A'' of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' begins with letters attributed to Gregory in the ''Sinemuriensis''. Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' (SM 1. 168, 175, 176, 188, 201, 204 and 209 and SM 2. 177 and SM 3. 88 and 96) are also found in the ten first folios of a French manuscript containing the ''[[Collectio IV librorum]]'', [[Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica 'Angelo Mai', MA 244]]. The Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 4375, which contains a canon law collection beginning like the ''Sinemuriensis'' with a series of excerpts from the pseudoisidorian decretals in chronological order, also has the ''professio archiepiscoporum'' and catalogue of popes from saint Peter to pope Johannes XII (955–64). This is the same list of popes found in the copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Ms Semur.		Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' are found in the ''[[Collectio Atrebatensis]]'' and together with excerpts from the ''Quadripartitus'' and the ''Sangermanensis'' in the [[Collectio canonum in Cambridge, CCC, 442\|collection in Cambridge, Corpus Christi 442]]. The section containing letters of Gregory I in the ''Collectio A'' of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' begins with letters attributed to Gregory in the ''Sinemuriensis''. Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' (SM 1. 168, 175, 176, 188, 201, 204 and 209 and SM 2. 177 and SM 3. 88 and 96) are also found in the ten first folios of a French manuscript containing the ''[[Collectio IV librorum]]'', [[Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica 'Angelo Mai', MA 244]]. The Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 4375, which contains a canon law collection beginning like the ''Sinemuriensis'' with a series of excerpts from the pseudoisidorian decretals in chronological order, also has the ''professio archiepiscoporum'' and catalogue of popes from saint Peter to pope Johannes XII (955–64). This is the same list of popes found in the copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Ms Semur.

	It was apparently a version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' similar in form to that in the Ms Madrid which was taken to Italy and used there at the end of the 11th century. Added to the end of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in this version is a series of texts associated with Gregory VII, the latest of which date from 1078. One of them is a letter to archbishop Manasses of Reims (Reg. 6. 2, {{JL\|5081}}). Among these texts are also 10 decrees from the November synod of 1078. John Gilchrist recognized that Roman decrees in the Madrid manuscript are the same as those in the [[Collectio II librorum/VIII partium]] (2L/8P). In fact these decrees are only part of a large block of canons in the 2L/8P taken from the ''Sinemuriensis''. The collection in the Ms Rome, Biblioteca [{{FM\|108}}] Vallicelliana B.89 also contains a block of texts from that collection. The decrees from the November synod of 1078 set before the copy of the ''Collectio IV librorum'' in the Ms Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana C. 51 sup. are also related to the transmission in the ''Sinemuriensis''.		It was apparently a version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' similar in form to that in the Ms Madrid which was taken to Italy and used there at the end of the 11th century. Added to the end of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in this version is a series of texts associated with Gregory VII, the latest of which date from 1078. One of them is a letter to archbishop Manasses of Reims (Reg. 6. 2, {{JL\|5081}}). Among these texts are also 10 decrees from the November synod of 1078. John Gilchrist recognized that Roman decrees in the Madrid manuscript are the same as those in the [[Collectio II librorum/VIII partium]] (2L/8P). In fact these decrees are only part of a large block of canons in the 2L/8P taken from the ''Sinemuriensis''. The collection in the Ms Rome, Biblioteca [{{FM\|108}}] Vallicelliana B.89 also contains a block of texts from that collection. The decrees from the November synod of 1078 set before the copy of the ''Collectio IV librorum'' in the Ms Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana C. 51 sup. are also related to the transmission in the ''Sinemuriensis''.

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - ".– " to ". – "

2025-12-19T12:10:14Z

Text replacement - ".– " to ". – "

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 19 December 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Literature==		==Literature==

	Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ott. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.		Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131. – For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ott. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.

	[[Category:Article needs to be split]]		[[Category:Article needs to be split]]

Christof Rolker: Added category

2025-11-23T23:28:34Z

Added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 24 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}{{Infobox collection\|title=Collectio Sinemuriensis\|key=SM\|author1=[[User:Linda Fowler-Magerl\|Linda Fowler-Magerl]]\|size=small (100 to 500 canons)\|century=saec. XI\|location=Reims\|normregion=Eastern France\|structure=farrago\|mss=some (2–9)}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}{{Infobox collection\|title=Collectio Sinemuriensis\|key=SM\|author1=[[User:Linda Fowler-Magerl\|Linda Fowler-Magerl]]\|size=small (100 to 500 canons)\|century=saec. XI\|location=Reims\|normregion=Eastern France\|structure=farrago\|mss=some (2–9)}}

	The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].		The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ({{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ({{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].

	This core of texts was later enriched with a block of canons from the ''Liber decretorum'' of Burchard. The result is represented in the versions of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss [[Paris, BnF, lat. 18221]] ('''SP''') and [[Semur-en-Auxois, BM, 13]], fol. 110r–205v ('''SS'''). The recensions in the Mss Schlettstadt and Paris 18221 add blocks of the same texts to the earlier version but insert them at different places in the collection. Some of the blocks of texts came from Reims, others from north and central Italy. There are two blocks of texts taken from letters of pope Gregory I, the second of which is taken from the fourth part of the ''Quadripartitus''. There is one block of texts from the ''Epitome Aegidii'' and ''Epitome Iuliani'', another block from a small Italian [[Florilegium in Reims, BM, 15]], another from the second and third quires of the Ms Vat. Barb. lat. 538 (the so-called ''[[Collectio Barberiniana]]'') and, finally, the block of texts now called the „[[Error series]]“.		This core of texts was later enriched with a block of canons from the ''Liber decretorum'' of Burchard. The result is represented in the versions of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss [[Paris, BnF, lat. 18221]] ('''SP''') and [[Semur-en-Auxois, BM, 13]], fol. 110r–205v ('''SS'''). The recensions in the Mss Schlettstadt and Paris 18221 add blocks of the same texts to the earlier version but insert them at different places in the collection. Some of the blocks of texts came from Reims, others from north and central Italy. There are two blocks of texts taken from letters of pope Gregory I, the second of which is taken from the fourth part of the ''Quadripartitus''. There is one block of texts from the ''Epitome Aegidii'' and ''Epitome Iuliani'', another block from a small Italian [[Florilegium in Reims, BM, 15]], another from the second and third quires of the Ms Vat. Barb. lat. 538 (the so-called ''[[Collectio Barberiniana]]'') and, finally, the block of texts now called the „[[Error series]]“.
Line 38:		Line 38:
	[[Category:Collection from Reims]]		[[Category:Collection from Reims]]
	[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]		[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]
			[[Category:Collection saec XI]]

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "Ottobon. lat" to "Ott. lat"

2025-11-20T13:13:43Z

Text replacement - "Ottobon. lat" to "Ott. lat"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 20 November 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Franck Roumy identified recently a 12th century copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'', made perhaps near Paris, in an auction catalogue and will be publishing an analysis shortly. The copy has just been purchased by the University of Columbia (NY) Library. In the meanwhile he has allowed me to reproduce some of his findings. The collection is divided into three books in the same way as the Semur copy. It contains the preface and libellus ''De vita et ordinatione episcoporum'' attributed to saint Ambrose. It also contains the extensive excerpt from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum'' of Hincmar of Reims not, however, ''De nuptiis''.		Franck Roumy identified recently a 12th century copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'', made perhaps near Paris, in an auction catalogue and will be publishing an analysis shortly. The copy has just been purchased by the University of Columbia (NY) Library. In the meanwhile he has allowed me to reproduce some of his findings. The collection is divided into three books in the same way as the Semur copy. It contains the preface and libellus ''De vita et ordinatione episcoporum'' attributed to saint Ambrose. It also contains the extensive excerpt from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum'' of Hincmar of Reims not, however, ''De nuptiis''.

	There are fragments of the Paris/Schlettstadt version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss Vat. ~~Ottobon~~. lat. 811, fol. 112r–114v and Vat. Reg. lat. 453, fol. 50r–55v. These fragments were once part of the same manuscript.		There are fragments of the Paris/Schlettstadt version of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss Vat. Ott. lat. 811, fol. 112r–114v and Vat. Reg. lat. 453, fol. 50r–55v. These fragments were once part of the same manuscript.

	Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' are found in the ''[[Collectio Atrebatensis]]'' and together with excerpts from the ''Quadripartitus'' and the ''Sangermanensis'' in the [[Collectio canonum in Cambridge, CCC, 442\|collection in Cambridge, Parker Library 442]]. The section containing letters of Gregory I in the ''Collectio A'' of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' begins with letters attributed to Gregory in the ''Sinemuriensis''. Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' (SM 1. 168, 175, 176, 188, 201, 204 and 209 and SM 2. 177 and SM 3. 88 and 96) are also found in the ten first folios of a French manuscript containing the ''[[Collectio IV librorum]]'', [[Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica 'Angelo Mai', MA 244]]. The Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 4375, which contains a canon law collection beginning like the ''Sinemuriensis'' with a series of excerpts from the pseudoisidorian decretals in chronological order, also has the ''professio archiepiscoporum'' and catalogue of popes from saint Peter to pope Johannes XII (955–64). This is the same list of popes found in the copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Ms Semur.		Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' are found in the ''[[Collectio Atrebatensis]]'' and together with excerpts from the ''Quadripartitus'' and the ''Sangermanensis'' in the [[Collectio canonum in Cambridge, CCC, 442\|collection in Cambridge, Parker Library 442]]. The section containing letters of Gregory I in the ''Collectio A'' of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]'' begins with letters attributed to Gregory in the ''Sinemuriensis''. Excerpts from the ''Sinemuriensis'' (SM 1. 168, 175, 176, 188, 201, 204 and 209 and SM 2. 177 and SM 3. 88 and 96) are also found in the ten first folios of a French manuscript containing the ''[[Collectio IV librorum]]'', [[Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica 'Angelo Mai', MA 244]]. The Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 4375, which contains a canon law collection beginning like the ''Sinemuriensis'' with a series of excerpts from the pseudoisidorian decretals in chronological order, also has the ''professio archiepiscoporum'' and catalogue of popes from saint Peter to pope Johannes XII (955–64). This is the same list of popes found in the copy of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Ms Semur.
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Literature==		==Literature==

	Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. ~~Ottobon~~. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.		Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ott. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.

	[[Category:Article needs to be split]]		[[Category:Article needs to be split]]

Christof Rolker at 22:56, 16 November 2025

2025-11-16T22:56:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 17 November 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].		The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].

	This core of texts was later enriched with a block of canons from the ''Liber decretorum'' of Burchard. The result is represented in the versions of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss [[Paris, BnF, lat. 18221]] ('''SP''') and ~~Schlettstadt~~, ~~Bibliothèque Humaniste~~ 13, fol. 110r–205v ('''SS'''). The recensions in the Mss Schlettstadt and Paris 18221 add blocks of the same texts to the earlier version but insert them at different places in the collection. Some of the blocks of texts came from Reims, others from north and central Italy. There are two blocks of texts taken from letters of pope Gregory I, the second of which is taken from the fourth part of the ''Quadripartitus''. There is one block of texts from the ''Epitome Aegidii'' and ''Epitome Iuliani'', another block from a small Italian [[Florilegium in Reims, BM, 15]], another from the second and third quires of the Ms Vat. Barb. lat. 538 (the so-called ''[[Collectio Barberiniana]]'') and, finally, the block of texts now called the „[[Error series]]“.		This core of texts was later enriched with a block of canons from the ''Liber decretorum'' of Burchard. The result is represented in the versions of the ''Sinemuriensis'' in the Mss [[Paris, BnF, lat. 18221]] ('''SP''') and [[Semur-en-Auxois, BM, 13]], fol. 110r–205v ('''SS'''). The recensions in the Mss Schlettstadt and Paris 18221 add blocks of the same texts to the earlier version but insert them at different places in the collection. Some of the blocks of texts came from Reims, others from north and central Italy. There are two blocks of texts taken from letters of pope Gregory I, the second of which is taken from the fourth part of the ''Quadripartitus''. There is one block of texts from the ''Epitome Aegidii'' and ''Epitome Iuliani'', another block from a small Italian [[Florilegium in Reims, BM, 15]], another from the second and third quires of the Ms Vat. Barb. lat. 538 (the so-called ''[[Collectio Barberiniana]]'') and, finally, the block of texts now called the „[[Error series]]“.

	Neither of the two above mentioned copies shows signs of having been divided into books. The copy in the Ms Paris has a ''capitulatio''; the copy in the Ms Schlettstadt does not. The collection has a title in the Ms Paris: ''Exceptiones ex decretis et dictis sanctorum patrum et auctoritate canonum''. In the Ms Paris there are several blocks of texts with excerpts from works of Hincmar (from the ''Libellus expostulationis'' against Hincmar of Laon, from the ''Opusculum Caroli Calvi regis'' and from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum'') at the end of the manuscript. The lengthiest of these blocks contains excerpts from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum''. Some of these excerpts, including texts from the ''Opusculum'', are integrated into the collection in the Ms Schlettstadt and into all later versions of the ''Sinemuriensis''. In the Ms Paris folios are missing between what are now folios 16 and 17 and between folios 17 and 18 so that the canons corresponding to 1. 93– 135 and 1. 151–164 of the version in the Ms Semur (the basis for the present analysis) are missing.		Neither of the two above mentioned copies shows signs of having been divided into books. The copy in the Ms Paris has a ''capitulatio''; the copy in the Ms Schlettstadt does not. The collection has a title in the Ms Paris: ''Exceptiones ex decretis et dictis sanctorum patrum et auctoritate canonum''. In the Ms Paris there are several blocks of texts with excerpts from works of Hincmar (from the ''Libellus expostulationis'' against Hincmar of Laon, from the ''Opusculum Caroli Calvi regis'' and from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum'') at the end of the manuscript. The lengthiest of these blocks contains excerpts from the ''Opusculum LV capitulorum''. Some of these excerpts, including texts from the ''Opusculum'', are integrated into the collection in the Ms Schlettstadt and into all later versions of the ''Sinemuriensis''. In the Ms Paris folios are missing between what are now folios 16 and 17 and between folios 17 and 18 so that the canons corresponding to 1. 93– 135 and 1. 151–164 of the version in the Ms Semur (the basis for the present analysis) are missing.

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "{{subst:Linda Fowler-Magerl}}" to "Linda Fowler-Magerl"

2025-11-01T19:42:01Z

Text replacement - "{{subst:Linda Fowler-Magerl}}" to "Linda Fowler-Magerl"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 1 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}{{Infobox collection\|title=Collectio Sinemuriensis\|key=SM\|author1=~~{{subst~~:Linda Fowler-Magerl}}\|size=small (100 to 500 canons)\|century=saec. XI\|location=Reims\|normregion=Eastern France\|structure=farrago\|mss=some (2–9)}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}{{Infobox collection\|title=Collectio Sinemuriensis\|key=SM\|author1=[[User:Linda Fowler-Magerl\|Linda Fowler-Magerl]]\|size=small (100 to 500 canons)\|century=saec. XI\|location=Reims\|normregion=Eastern France\|structure=farrago\|mss=some (2–9)}}

	The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].		The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].

Christof Rolker: added infobox

2025-11-01T12:32:04Z

added infobox

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 1 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Sinemuriensis''}}{{Infobox collection\|title=Collectio Sinemuriensis\|key=SM\|author1={{subst:Linda Fowler-Magerl}}\|size=small (100 to 500 canons)\|century=saec. XI\|location=Reims\|normregion=Eastern France\|structure=farrago\|mss=some (2–9)}}

	The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].		The ''Collectio Sinemuriensis'' survives in several versions. The original version was compiled at Reims. It has not survived and was apparently not used outside northeastern France. Later augmented versions reached Aquitaine and northern and central Italy. The first version, consisting of about 209 canons, has left traces in later versions. Like all later versions of the collection, the first version was not systematic but consisted of blocks of canons taken from earlier collections. The collection began with the forged papal decretals taken in chronological order from the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. Further texts were taken from the Register of pope Gregory I, the Capitula of Martin of Braga, the letter of pope Martin I to Amandus of Tongeren ( {{JE\|2059}}), a letter of pope Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}), the Boniface/ Zacharias correspondence, a forged letter attributed to pope Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}), canons of the eighth council of Toledo, excerpts from letters of pope Nicholas I (including {{JE\|2735}}, 2697, 2721, 2720 and 2691), the consulta of pope Nicholas to the Bulgarians and the consultation ''De nuptiis'' of Hincmar of Reims. The transmission of the letters {{JE\|2059}}, {{JE\|2174}} and the Boniface/Zacharias correspondence are all closely associated with the transmission of the C version of the pseudoisidorian decretals. The forgery {{JE+\|2579}} (also found in the copy of the pseudoisidorian decretals in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 1557 and in the Ms Reims, BM 672) is transmitted here out of its original [{{FM\|105}}] context for the first time. It has been thought that it appeared for the first time in the [[Diversorum patrum sententiae\|''Diversorum patrum sententie'' (74T)]].
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Since the ''Sinemuriensis'' circulated so widely and has not yet been edited (I hasten to add that I have no intention of doing so myself), every one of the five copies has been examined and at least the sequence of the canons in each of the copies has been recorded in the data bank. The text of SM was compared with that of SP, SS and the fragments. The text of SN was compared with that of SO.		Since the ''Sinemuriensis'' circulated so widely and has not yet been edited (I hasten to add that I have no intention of doing so myself), every one of the five copies has been examined and at least the sequence of the canons in each of the copies has been recorded in the data bank. The text of SM was compared with that of SP, SS and the fragments. The text of SN was compared with that of SO.

	== Literature ==		==Literature==

	Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ottobon. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.		Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ottobon. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "Category:Pre-Gratian Collection" to "Category:Pre-Gratian Collection Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters"

2025-10-31T14:35:36Z

Text replacement - "Category:Pre-Gratian Collection" to "Category:Pre-Gratian Collection Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 31 October 2025
Line 35:		Line 35:
	[[Category:Canonical Collection]]		[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
	[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]]		[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]]
			[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters]]
	[[Category:Collection from Reims]]		[[Category:Collection from Reims]]
	[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]		[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "Category:Canonical Collection" to "Category:Canonical Collection Category:Pre-Gratian Collection"

2025-10-31T12:59:32Z

Text replacement - "Category:Canonical Collection" to "Category:Canonical Collection Category:Pre-Gratian Collection"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 31 October 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	[[Category:Lacks categories]]		[[Category:Lacks categories]]
	[[Category:Canonical Collection]]		[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
			[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]]
	[[Category:Collection from Reims]]		[[Category:Collection from Reims]]
	[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]		[[Category:Collection from Eastern France]]

Christof Rolker: Text replacement - "The Beginning of the Decretal Tradition, pp. ([1-9][0-9])" to "Beginning pp. $1"

2025-06-03T04:39:12Z

Text replacement - "The Beginning of the Decretal Tradition, pp. ([1-9][0-9])" to "Beginning pp. $1"

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 3 June 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Literature ==		== Literature ==

	Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, ~~The~~ Beginning ~~of the Decretal Tradition,~~ pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ottobon. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.		Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, Manuscrits de collections canoniques, BMCL 6 (1976), pp. 67 f recognized that the Mss Semur and Madrid contain the same collection albeit in different versions, and he named it ''Collectio Sinemuriensis''. In 1983 I renamed the collection ''Collectio Remensis''. A year later I retracted the renaming because of possible confusion with the Carolingian collection in the Ms Berlin, SBPK Phillipps 1743. See {{Author\|Fowler-Magerl}}, Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen pp. 124–141 (for the manuscripts and sources of the ''Sinemuriensis'') and also my Fine distinctions, pp. 166–172. Martina {{Author\|Stratmann}}, Zur Rezeption Hinkmars von Reims durch Bernhard von Hildesheim und Bernold von Konstanz, DA 44 (1988), pp. 170– 180 corrected the confusion between Bernold of Constance and Bernhard of Hildesheim in my Vier französische und spanische Kanonessammlungen, p. 139 n. 79. See also Rudolf {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Hinkmar von Reims, Opusculum LV capitulorum (MGH Conc. 4 Suppl. 2, Hanover 2003), pp. 123–127. – For the circulation of the letter of Martin I ( {{JE\|2059}}) together with the C version of Pseudo-Isidore see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. 92, 95f and 126. For the circulation of the letter of Gregory II ( {{JE\|2174}}) see pp. 75 n. 322, 79, 98, 99 n. 44, 100, 101 n. 54 and 116 n. 124. For the circulation of the letter attributed to Gregory IV ({{JE+\|2579}}) see pp. 78 n. 338, 79, 102 f, 126, 171 n. 131.– For the copy in the Ms Paris, BnF, lat. 18221 see Gérard {{Author\|Fransen}}, La lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet du mariage d’Étienne. Une relecture, in: Pascua Mediaevalia . Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. De Smet, ed. by R. {{Author\|Lievens}} (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 10, Louvain 1983), p. 134. – For the Schlettstadt manuscript see Ian Stuart {{Author\|Robinson}}, Zur Arbeitsweise Bernolds von Konstanz und seines Kreises: Untersuchungen zum Schlettstädter Codex 13, DA 34 (1978), pp. 51– 122, esp. 51–82. For the information that the present manuscript consists of two originally independent manuscripts and that the one which contained the ''Sinemuriensis'' had nothing to do with the other, I am indebted to Detlev {{Author\|Jasper}}. – For the „Error- series“ see Jörg W. {{Author\|Busch}}, Der Liber de Honore Ecclesiae des Placidus von Nonantola. Eine kanonistische Problemerörterung aus dem Jahre 1111. Die Arbeitsweise ihres Autors und seine Vorlagen (Quellen und Forschungen zum Mittelalter 5, Sigmaringen 1990), pp. 102–114. – Rudolf {{Author\|Pokorny}} brought my attention to the fragment in the Ms Vat. Ottobon. lat. 811. – For the collection in the Ms Cambridge Parker Library 442 see Martin {{Author\|Brett}}, The Collectio Lanfranci and ist Competitors, in: Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays [{{FM\|110}}] presented to Margaret Gibson, ed. Leslie {{Author\|Smith}} and Benedicta {{Author\|Ward}}, London 1992, p. 169. – For the ten first folios of the Ms Bergamo, Biblioteca Civica MA 244 see {{Author\|Jasper}}, Das Papstwahldekret, p. 20 n. 71. – For the synodal decrees of Gregory VII and the letter to Manasses in the Ms Madrid see John {{Author\|Gilchrist}}, The Reception. Part II, p. 197; reprinted in his selected studies Canon Law in the Age of Reform, No. IX. – For the transmission of ''Vigilantia'', see {{Author\|Schieffer}}, Die Entstehung des päpstlichen Investiturverbots, p. 211. – For the connection between Urban II and the ''Sinemuriensis'' see Alfons {{Author\|Becker}}, Rechtsprinzipien und Verfahrensregeln im päpstlichen Gerichtswesen zur Zeit Urbans II, in: Landesgeschichte und Reichsgeschichte: Festschrift für Alois Gerlich zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Winfried {{Author\|Dotzauer}}, Stuttgart 1995, pp. 51–66. – {{Author\|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery\|203}}–204.

	[[Category:Article needs to be split]]		[[Category:Article needs to be split]]